Typical scenario

Vehicle damage was aligned without checking body height

Matching scratches on flat diagrams may depend on assumed body positions. Review a contact hypothesis by checking trace height above a shared reference plane, contacting shapes, and load, suspension and deformation effects.

What needs to be clarified

Assess geometric support for damage comparison, verify dimensions and vehicle positions, identify consistent contact features and state assumptions needed for the proposed relative placement.

Materials to prepare

  • Report with alignment diagrams and original damage-height measurements
  • Scaled photographs of both vehicles and suspension-condition information
  • Inspection records covering load, wheels and panel repairs

What to compare

Check reference plane, scale, landmarks and measurement method. Compare projections, scratch direction and deformation boundaries allowing for body attitude changes. Repeat alignment across documented plausible positions. Colour transfer alone identifies no coating without separate analysis; assess conflicting and matching areas together.

Possible outcome of the analysis

A verified diagram and body-position sensitivity review may support the contact hypothesis or indicate a need for further measurements and comparative examination of the vehicles.

Limits of the conclusions

Geometric compatibility proves no unique mechanism, speed or fault. Suspension changes, repairs and missing original measurements limit findings; restoration costs require separate assessment.

Write to usDiscuss your task ↗